Meeks v. Schofield et al
| Danny Ray Meeks |
| Derrick D. Schofield, Mike Christensen, Chris Aibangbee, Tennessee Department of Correction and Dennis Davis |
| 3:2012cv00545 |
| May 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
377
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Because the plaintiff filed what amounts to a blanket objection to the magistrate judge's R&R, the court has conducted a de novo review of the defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having conducted such a review, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the court finds that the defendants are entitled to summary ju dgment as to all claims asserted against them in the complaint. The motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 284 ) is therefore GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED. The R&R is adopted insofar as it reaches the same outcome, and the plaintiff's objections to the R&R are overruled. It is so ORDERED. This is a final order for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/31/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
367
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Mandatory Injunction 249 ; Motion for CourtOrdered Protection of Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Rights 269 ; and Motion for Court to Enter Ruling in D.E. No. 249 288 are DENIED.Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/14/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
363
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 284 MOTION for Summary Judgment. In summary, for the reasons stated above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that Defendants are entitled to judgm ent as a matter of law. Therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED, and the complaint, as amended, DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/6/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
319
ORDER TO PRODUCE: The Warden of the Jailor of the institution where the Plaintiff is now incarcerated is hereby ORDERED TO PRODUCE Danny Ray Meeks #116192, on November 25, 2013, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 873, United States Courthouse, Nashville, Ten nessee, and at the conclusion of the hearing, to return Plaintiff to said institution. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 11/4/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Warden by regular and certified mail. Sgt. Rita Reed via e-mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
311
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for release of discovery evidence 176 is DENIED, without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to seek relief in his unrelated action, Case No. 1:07-0013. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 10/1/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
226
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Before the court are the plaintiff's objections (ECF Nos. 216 , 217 , and 218 ) to several different orders entered by the magistrate judge (ECF Nos. 201 , 202 and 205 ). Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/9/2013. The plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
221
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court finds that the proposed intervenors are not entitled to intervene as of right under Rule 24(a), and that permissive intervention under Rule 24(b) is not warranted. The magistrate judge's recommendation (ECF No . 182) that the motions to intervene be denied is hereby ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED, and the motions to intervene (ECF Nos. 84, 85, 87, 89, and 91) are DENIED. Further, because the motions to intervene have been denied, the motions for appointment of co unsel (ECF Nos. 86, 88, 90, and 92) have been rendered moot. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/30/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 54 Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 11/2/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/29/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
