Hessmer v. Bad Government
Plaintiff: John Hessmer
Defendant: Bad Government
Case Number: 3:2012cv00590
Filed: June 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Presiding Judge: E. Clifton Knowles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 120 ) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 122 and 123). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approve d. To the extent Plaintiff's "Usurpation Complaint" (Docket No. 122) and "Rule 60(b) Notice" (Docket No. 123) are independent of objections to the Report and Recommendation, they are without merit and relief is denied. Plain tiffs allegations of bias and request for recusal are also without merit and DENIED. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/11/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 120 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/20/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 89 ) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 103). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordin gly, Plaintiff's Motion to Add Wilson County for Retaliatory Transfer (Docket No. 74 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/4/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/14/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff seeks to sue Sheriff Ashe for incidents that occurred in the year 2000. Any such claims are barred by the statute of limitations. T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a)(3). For the foregoing reasons, the instant Motion (Docket No. 65) should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/20/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 43), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopte d and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's purported amendment (Docket No. 42) is stricken. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further case management. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/19/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are three Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Nos. 30 , 31 and 34 ), to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Reports an d Recommendations and the file. The Reports and Recommendations are adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Add Party (Docket No. 14) is DENIED; Plaintiff's purported Amendments (Docket Nos. 26 and 27) are STRICKEN from the record; and Plaintiff's Petition for Injunction (Docket No. 28) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/9/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
October 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No.15) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 23). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Pl aintiff's claims against all Defendants, except Defendant Chief Bryant in his individual capacity for alleged retaliatory transfer, be DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law c laims, and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The case against Defendant Bryant is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Court's prior Order (Docket No. 3). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/19/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail w/ service packet.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Clerk be instructed to send pltf a service packet for deft Chief Bryant only, and that pltf's claims against all other defts be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 9/10/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hessmer v. Bad Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hessmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bad Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?