Crockett v. Mutual of Omaha Bank et al
| Elizabeth E. Crockett |
| Mutual of Omaha Bank, M&T Bank Corporation, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00779 |
| July 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER and MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT: The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 20 ), to which objections have been filed (Docket Nos. 24 ,and 25 ). For the reasons expressed herein, the plaintiff's renewed Motion to Remand filed on October 10, 2012 (Id., Docket No. 11 ) is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Davidson County, from which it was removed. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/2/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail, and Circuit Court for Davidson County by certified mail only.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Bryant RECOMMENDS that the MOTION to Remand 11 be Granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 5/30/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
