Jabal v. United States of America

Jabal v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Dwaquille Raheem Jabal
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	3:2012cv00896
Filed:	August 29, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 19, 2013	Filing 40 ORDER: For these reasons, the Court does not discern any factual or legal basis to set aside the Order of dismissal. (Docket Entry No. 22). Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for Rule 62.l Indication Ruling on a Motion for Relief that is Barred by a Pending Appeal. (Docket Entry No. 34) is DENIED. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/18/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
May 24, 2013	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM and ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Movant's motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is given ten days from the date of entry of this Order to file a petition for a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 5/24/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/24/2013: # 1 Attachment Text Searchable Memorandum and Order) (tmw).

Date Filed

Document Text

July 19, 2013

Filing 40 ORDER: For these reasons, the Court does not discern any factual or legal basis to set aside the Order of dismissal. (Docket Entry No. 22). Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for Rule 62.l Indication Ruling on a Motion for Relief that is Barred by a Pending Appeal. (Docket Entry No. 34) is DENIED. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/18/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

May 24, 2013

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM and ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Movant's motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is given ten days from the date of entry of this Order to file a petition for a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 5/24/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/24/2013: # 1 Attachment Text Searchable Memorandum and Order) (tmw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jabal v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	William Lee Deneke
Represented By:	Jimmie Lynn Ramsaur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dwaquille Raheem Jabal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?