Cole v. State of Tennessee et al
| David Charles Cole |
| Derrick Schofield, Eddie Jackson and State of Tennessee |
| 3:2012cv00919 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, the court finds that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The complaint is therefore DISMISSED. Also pending is the plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 . Because it appears from his submissions that the plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the full $350 filing fee in advance, the application 2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is assessed the c ivil filing fee of $350.00. Custodian of plaintiff's inmate trust account at the institution where he resides is directed to submit to the Clerk of Court an initial partial payment according to the terms outlined in this order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/19/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Warden of Riverbend Maximum Security Institution by regular mail)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
