Williams v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
| Joseph G. Williams |
| Daron Hall, Garen Blanchard and Jane Doe |
| 3:2012cv00932 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
ORDER: On June 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 141 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Third Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Prosecution by defendants Blanchard and Graham (Docket No. 132 ) is GRANTED, and the claims against these defendants are DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other defendants having been previously dismissed from this case, the Clerk shall CLOSE this file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/23/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER: On January 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 104 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Blanchard and Graham (Docket No. 92 ) is DENIED. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral Order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/31/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth herein, the court ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Griffin's Report and Recommendation, GRANTS defendant Daron Hall's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 42 ), and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the claims agains t defendant Hall on the basis that they are barred by the statute of limitations. It is so ORDERED. The claims against the other two defendants remain pending, and this action remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/13/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
55
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set out above, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 42) filed by Defendant Daron Hall be GRANTED, that the plaintiff's claims for wrongful imprisonment be D ISMISSED, and that Defendant Hall be DISMISSED from the action WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/14/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/10/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
