Price v. State of Tennessee et al
Jerrell Price |
John V. Daniel, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department and Jeffery A. Morlock |
3:2012cv00943 |
September 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Montgomery |
John S. Bryant |
Todd J. Campbell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 56 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is ad opted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order, failure to prosecute, and failure to keep the Court informed as to his current address. Any pending Moti ons are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/7/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (afs) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/13/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (afs) [Transferred from Tennessee Middle on 9/14/2012.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.