Dauenhauer et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
Dolores-Rose Dauenhauer and Helen E. Chamberlain |
The Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of America, National Association, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A., John and Jane Does 1-100 and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. |
3:2012cv01026 |
October 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
John T. Nixon |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER: The Court Grants Defendants' Motion 11 and DISMISSES Plaintiffs' Complaint. Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider 32 is therefore TERMINATED AS MOOT. This Order terminates the Court's jurisdiction over this case, and the case is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/28/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified Text on 5/29/2013 (dt). |
Filing 47 ORDER denying 38 Motion to Realign Parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/17/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 31 ORDER: For the reasons above, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for temporary injunctive relief 9 and DISSOLVES the state court injunction. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 1/16/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.