Peoples v. Lindamood
||Michael Deshay Peoples, Jr.
||November 14, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||Aleta A. Trauger
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 26, 2013
ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds that the petitioner's pro se § 2254 habeas petition 1 lacks merit. Therefore, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Should the pe titioner file a timely notice of appeal from this order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability which shall NOT issue because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/26/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|November 27, 2012
ORDER: The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition and finds that the petitioner has stated a colorable claim for relief. The respondent shall file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the petition, within 30 days of the date of entry of this order on the docket. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/27/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; Warden w/ petition & order by regular mail; AG w/ petition & order by regular mail)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?