Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Myers
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| David S. Myers |
| 3:2012cv01241 |
| November 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Williamson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Contract: Other |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/10/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : The undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that the FDICs motion to strike Defendant's affirmative defenses should be DENIED and that, to the extent that Myers seeks to assert a counterclaim for any monetary damages against FDIC, the motion to dismiss such counterclaims should be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/29/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The undersigned GRANTS Defendant Myers's motion to compel and ORDERS that FDIC produce documents responsive to these six requests no later than October 27, 2014. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/24/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
