Murdock v. Bruce et al
| Marshall H. Murdock |
| Patsy Bruce, Yusuf A. Hakeem, Ronnie Cole, Joe Hill, Lisa M. Jones, Anthony Johnson, Charles Traughber, Derrick Schofield, Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Jane Doe, Joe Doe, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe II |
| 3:2012cv01244 |
| November 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 110 ), to which Plaintiff has responded (Doc. No. 114 ). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 93 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. No. 96 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/15/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
110
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the Court are the Plaintiff's second motion for summary judgment and the Defendants' motion to strike the motion for summary judgment. (Docket Entries 93 and 96 ). For the reasons provided be low, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the Defendants' motion to strike be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 5/9/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 97 ) is hereb y ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 84 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (3) Defendants' Motion to Strike (Docket No. 90 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/7/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 71 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motions for Summary Judgment 43 & 56 are hereby DENIED. This action is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/24/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
71
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons state above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (Docket Entry Nos. 43 and 56 ) should be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/6/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 21 Motion to Incorporate Documentary Evidence as Required by Court Rules & Statute. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/17/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: The plaintiff is hereby GRANTED 30 days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the full filing fee of $350 or submit the aforementioned certified statement from the custodian of his inmate trust account. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/20/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
