Williams v. SESAC Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jocita Canrini Williams
Defendant: SESAC and SESAC Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv01309
Filed: December 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Other Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the Report and Recommendation, the defendants' Motion to Reinstate Entry of Default (Docket No. 58) will be GRANTED, default will be REINSTATED against the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's claims are DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes the final judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/28/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER: Pursuant to the Order entered by the Honorable Aleta A. Trauger on June 5, 2014 64 , the Pretrial Conference set for June 20, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned is CANCELLED. All other pretrial deadlines are continued to be reset by separate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 6/6/14. (dt)
June 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: The plaintiff shall respond to the Counterclaim lodged by the defendants by June 30, 2014. If she does file a timely response to the Counterclaim, default on the Counterclaim will not be entered. If she does not, the court will accept the pe nding Report and Recommendation and grant a default on the Counterclaim. The bench trial scheduled for July 1, 2014 before this court is CONTINUED, to be reset, if appropriate, by later order of the court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/5/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that the instant Motion be GRANTED, that the default be reinstated against Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/20/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/1/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 31 Motion IN PART. The Plaintiff is permitted to file through ECF. Plaintiff must follow the requirement set out in the Local Rules and Administrative Practices and Procedures Manual. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/1/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(la)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 SCHEDULING ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 8/22/2013. Discovery due by 12/20/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 1/20/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/16/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ENTRY OF DEFAULT: Default is here by entered against Plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). SESAC may now proceed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)to file a motion seeking a default judgment against Williams. Signed by Clerk of Court Keith Throckmorton on 5/14/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
January 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to send the plaintiff a blank long-form Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The plaintiff, in turn, MUST resubmit her application to proceed as a pauper using this lon g form within 30 DAYS of the date of this order. The court will defer ruling on the plaintiff's application to proceed as a pauper until the plaintiff submits the appropriate form. The plaintiff MUST also submit an amended pleading that satisfie s the requirements of Rule 8(a) within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/11/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail w/ IFP form.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. SESAC Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SESAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SESAC Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jocita Canrini Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?