Harris v. State of Tennessee

Harris v. State of Tennessee

Petitioner:	Vincent Roger Harris
Respondent:	State of Tennessee
Case Number:	3:2013cv00019
Filed:	January 10, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 8, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER denying 19 Motion from Relief from Judgment and the request for appointment of counsel is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/5/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (ds)
January 17, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER: Because it is clear from the petitioner's filing that the present petition was filed well outside the statute of limitation, and because the petitioner has not presented any basis for equitable tolling, the petition is hereby DISMISSED, u nder the authority of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 petitions, as barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order on the Tennessee Attorney General, and to give notice of this order to the petitioner. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/17/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Order and petition to Atty General of TN by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 8, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER denying 19 Motion from Relief from Judgment and the request for appointment of counsel is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/5/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (ds)

January 17, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER: Because it is clear from the petitioner's filing that the present petition was filed well outside the statute of limitation, and because the petitioner has not presented any basis for equitable tolling, the petition is hereby DISMISSED, u nder the authority of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 petitions, as barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order on the Tennessee Attorney General, and to give notice of this order to the petitioner. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/17/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. Order and petition to Atty General of TN by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. State of Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Vincent Roger Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?