Cockrill v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 30, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 18 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Stay Pre-Trial Deadlines and Discovery (Docket No. 13 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/30/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|May 10, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This matter is before the Court upon a "Motion to Stay Pre-Trial Deadlines and Discovery," filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., and the Bank of New York Mellon. Docket No. 13. Defendants have filed a supporting Memorandum which is only slightly longer than the Motion itself, and which cites essentially no authority for the stay Defendants seek. Docket No. 14. Judge Campbell has referred the Motion to the undersigned for a Report and Recommendation. Docket No. 16. The undersigned recommends that the instant "Motion to Stay Pre-trial Deadlines and Discovery," (Docket No. 13 ) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/10/2013. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?