Perry et al v. A T V Music, Inc. Ltd et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 14, 2014
ORDER: Having considered all of Plaintiff's arguments, the Court rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation 39 is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants' motion to dismiss 36 is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint 45 is DENIED; (4) Plaintiff's motion for judgment against Defendants 57 is DENIED AS MOOT; (5) Plaintiff's motion for a court order "Demanding The Defendants To Pay Damages To The Plaintiff" 60 is DENIED AS MOOT; (6) Plaintiff's motion for a court order "To Enforce the Plaintiff's Re[s]cissions" 61 is DENIED AS MOOT; (7) This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare and enter a final judgment in accordance w ith Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/14/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|September 24, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion to dismiss 36 be GRANTED and that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to allege activity, which occurred within the statute of limitations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/24/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?