Nevils v. State of Tennessee et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 24, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court discerns no basis for exercising jurisdiction over the plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation, to the extent that it recommends that the Motion to Amend be deni ed, is ADOPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly, the plaintiffs Motion to Amend is hereby DENIED for want of jurisdiction. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/24/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|August 29, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that the instant Motion to Amend Cases (Docket No. 21 ) should be DENIED, insofar as it pertains to the instant case. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/29/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|May 21, 2013
ORDER granting 2 Application to proceed in forma pauperis and Assessing Filing Fee for Gene Nevils. In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Consequently , this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/21/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail & Sheriff of Williamson County by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?