Riddle v. Riddle

Riddle v. Riddle

Plaintiff:	Timothy Glenn Riddle
Defendant:	James Wallace Riddle
Case Number:	3:2013cv00327
Filed:	April 10, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 6, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER: Because the plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's order and failed to take the necessary steps to prosecute this action, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Further, the Clerk is DIRECTED to unseal the document filed at docket entry no. 10. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/6/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
April 30, 2013	Filing 7 ORDER: Accordingly, Riddle has not provided a legitimate basis for reconsideration of the order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion to reconsider is therefore DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/30/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 6, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER: Because the plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's order and failed to take the necessary steps to prosecute this action, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Further, the Clerk is DIRECTED to unseal the document filed at docket entry no. 10. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/6/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

April 30, 2013

Filing 7 ORDER: Accordingly, Riddle has not provided a legitimate basis for reconsideration of the order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion to reconsider is therefore DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/30/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riddle v. Riddle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Glenn Riddle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: James Wallace Riddle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?