Ruge v. The Bailey Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arthur A. Ruge
Defendant:
The Bailey Company, Inc.
Case Number:
3:2013cv00448
Filed:
May 13, 2013
Court:
Tennessee Middle District Court
Office:
Nashville Office
County:
Davidson
Presiding Judge:
William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit:
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
July 1, 2015 | 44 |
![]() |
May 18, 2015 | 41 |
![]() |
April 2, 2014 | 27 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ruge v. The Bailey Company, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arthur A. Ruge | |
Represented By: | Ronald J. Berke |
Represented By: | Jeremy Matthew Cothern |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Bailey Company, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.