Thompson v. Spurgeon et al
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Thompson, Jr.
Defendant: Robert Spurgeon and Gayla Gibbs
Case Number: 3:2013cv00526
Filed: May 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Dickson
Presiding Judge: Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation 39 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants' Robert Spurgeon and Gayla Gibbs Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is hereby GRANTED; (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (4) Any appeal shall NOT be certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) as taken in good faith. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/8/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Motion For Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 24) be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court further RECOMMENDS that any appeal NOT be certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/9/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: Presently pending before the Court is the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 24 . The plaintiff shall have until January 10, 2014, to file a response to the motion for summary judgment. In light of the motion for summary judgment , the evidentiary hearing currently set for February 6, 2014, is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 11/26/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. An appropriate order is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/7/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Spurgeon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Spurgeon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gayla Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Thompson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?