Vargas v. Trauger et al
| Alva N. Vargas |
| (f/n/u) Gilman, (f/n/u) Cole, (f/n/u) Kennedy, Juliet E. Griffin, Aleta A. Trauger and Alice M. Batchelder |
| 3:2013cv00600 |
| June 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER: The plaintiff's claims are patently without merit, the Court hereby CERTIFIES that the appeal in this matter is not in good faith. Accordingly, as indicated above, in order to pursue her appeal, the plaintiff must, within 30 days after se rvice of this order, either submit the $455 appellate filing fee to this Court in full, or file a motion directly with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide notice of this order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/29/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. )(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/25/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
