Blair v. Nelson et al
Plaintiff: Reggie D. Blair
Defendant: Derrick Nelson, Guaranteed Logistics, LLC and Southeast Logistics, LLC
Case Number: 3:2013cv00755
Filed: July 31, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 184 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Two more evidentiary issues were raised at trial on August 3, 2016. The Court took both issues under advisement. For the reasons below, in addition to the reasons given from the bench on August 4, 2016, the Court will not al low Plaintiff's vocational expert to mention Plaintiff's criminal history, and will allow Defendant to read Ms. Osborne's deposition to the jury. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/4/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 176 ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's late-filed thirteenth motion in limine (Docs. No. 151, 159), third motion for a directed verdict (Doc. No. 155), and Defendants' late-filed third motion in limine (Docs. No. 169, 170). For the foll owing reasons, in addition to the reasons given from the bench on August 2, 2016, all motions are DENIED. Further, Plaintiff's case against Laniqua Osborne is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/2/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
September 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/8/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER: The hearing on Plaintiff's motion to compel (Docket Entry No. 39 ) currently set for Monday, April 28, 2014 at 4:30 p.m. is reset for Monday, May 12, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 4/28/2014. (hb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blair v. Nelson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reggie D. Blair
Represented By: Henry Shere Queener, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derrick Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guaranteed Logistics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southeast Logistics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?