Grant et al v. Fifth Third Bank
| FTG Investments LLC and Tracy S. Grant |
| Fifth Third Bank |
| 3:2013cv00845 |
| August 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John T Nixon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: Plaintiffs Tracy S. Grant and FTG Investments LLC have filed a Notice of Dismissal, in which they request the Court dismiss the above-captioned case ("Notice"). (Doc. No. #12 .) Although Plaintiff seeks dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l )(A)(ii), the Notice is not signed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank as required by the Rule. However, as Defendant has not served either an answer or motion for summary judgment, dismissal is appropriate under Rule 41 (a)(l)(A)(i). Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/22/2013. (hb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Dismissal (Docket Entry No. #12 ) in this matter. The initial case management conference set for October 29, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELED. There is nothing further to be done in this matter by the undersigned. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to return the file to the District Judge for his consideration of the stipulation of dismissal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 10/21/2013. (hb)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tracy S. Grant (Falls, Naill) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing by Fifth Third Bank (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Master Agreement), #2 Exhibit B (Schedule to Master Agreement), #3 Exhibit C (Confirmation of Transaction), #4 Exhibit D (Continuing Swap Guaranty))(Grooms, Garry) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Fifth Third Bank . (Grooms, Garry) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Fifth Third Bank. (Grooms, Garry) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference is reset for 10/29/2013 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 10/1/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference by Fifth Third Bank. (Grooms, Garry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/7/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 776 before Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant. (hb) Modified text on 8/27/2013 (hb). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE from USDC Clerk regarding Corporate Disclosure Statement requirement. (hb) |
| Filing 4 RECEIPT #34675027981 in the amount of $400 re #1 Notice of Removal. (hb) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fifth Third Bank. (hb) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Richard W. Holmes, Jr. filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Corporate Documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - Incumbency Certificate)(hb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Fifth Third Bank from Circuit Court for Davidson County, case number 13C3248. (filing fee paid $400) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hb) |
| BAR STATUS for Attys. Garry K. Grooms, J. Matthew Kroplin, H. Naill Falls, Jr. and John B. Veach, III of TN verified as active on this date. (hb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
