Durham v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee
| Robert W. Durham |
| City of Clarksville, Tennessee |
| 3:2013cv00907 |
| September 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Montgomery |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The current Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 35 ) is a result of the above-described second opportunity given to Plaintiff. Given Plaintiff's continued failure to comply timely and properly with the Court's Orders, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections should be overruled, and the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 32 ), to which Plain tiff filed no Response, is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/2/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
35
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The instant Motion (Docket No. 32) should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/8/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Amend Complaint. Therefore, Plaintiff shall file a separate Amended Complaint containing his allegations and claims against Defendant. Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint on or before June 16, 2014. Plaintiff sh all effect proper service of the Amended Complaint upon Defendant on or before July 7, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/28/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER: In light of the Objections of the Plaintiff, the Report and Recommendation is rejected, and this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge to rule on the pending Motion to Amend Complaint and to allow another opportunity for Plaintiff to mak e proper service of process of the original Complaint or the Amended Complaint (if allowed) upon Defendant. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 7 is denied without prejudice to being re-filed if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/27/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, Defendant has not been properly served, and the undersigned recommends that instant Motion to Dismiss 7 should be GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In view of this recommendation, the undersigned need not address D efendant's argument that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 5/1/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Durham v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Clarksville, Tennessee | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Lonergan |
| Represented By: | John P. Rodgers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert W. Durham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
