Greene v. Robertson County et al
| Terri Greene |
| Robertson County and Robertson County Board of Education |
| 3:2013cv01038 |
| September 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Robertson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/31/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying as moot 25 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/9/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 7/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
19
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 12/15/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 1/15/2015. Jury Trial set for 6/2/2015 at 9:00 AM before Chief Judge William J. Haynes Jr. Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2015 at 3:00 PM before Chief Judge William J. Haynes Jr. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/10/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
