Franklin American Mortgage Company v. The University National Bank of Lawrence
Plaintiff: Franklin American Mortgage Company
Defendant: The University National Bank of Lawrence
Case Number: 3:2013cv01109
Filed: October 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Williamson
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion 67 for summary judgment is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that damages are awarded for plaintiff in the amount of $188,858.71. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion [69 ] for summary judgment is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion 76 to strike excessive pages is denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 12/14/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Trauger recuses in this case. The bench trial scheduled for June 9, 2015 and the pretrial conference scheduled for June5, 2015 are being removed from Judge Trauger's calendar. Senior Judge Nixon assigned to this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/4/2014. (ds)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 *DISREGARD - ENTERED IN ERROR* ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within 30 days of entry of this order. Defendant shall, within 28 days of service of the plaintiff's br ief, file a brief in response. Plaintiff has 14 days after service of the defendant's response to file a reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified Text on 7/21/2014 (dt).
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Leave to File Reply to 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 25 Motion to Strike is denied. Request to file sur-reply is granted. The sur-reply should be filed by August 15, 2014. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/17/2014.(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/18/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin American Mortgage Company v. The University National Bank of Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Franklin American Mortgage Company
Represented By: Charles M. Cain, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The University National Bank of Lawrence
Represented By: Derek W. Edwards
Represented By: Jacquelyne D. Garfield
Represented By: Todd Ryan Hambidge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?