Boyd v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
Lamont Boyd |
James Yarbrough, Corrections Corporation of America and Blair Leibach |
3:2013cv01207 |
November 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Todd J. Campbell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION. An appropriate order is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/2/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail the plaintiff a blank application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees and costs and a copy of Administrative Order 93. The plaintiff MUST either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full or complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis and return the properly completed application, along with a current trust-account statement, to the district Court. The plaintiff's submissions must be received in this court within 30 d ays of the date this order is entered on the docket. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/21/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail along w/blank ifp app and copy of AO No. 93.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.