Crockett v. Satterlee et al
| Antonio M. Crockett |
| Brandon Robertson, Scott Satterlee and Corey Toney |
| 3:2013mc00068 |
| August 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER: Plaintiff Antonio M. Crockett, an inmate or pretrial detainee presently held at the Davidson County Sheriffs Office Criminal Justice Center in Nashville, Tennessee, seeks to file in this Court a pro se complaint asserting claims under 42 U. S.C. § 1983. With his complaint, however, the plaintiff did not submit either the requisite $350.00 filing fee (plus $50.00 administrative fee) or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail t he plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff, in turn, is DIRECTED either to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full or to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis and return the properly completed appl ication to the district Court, within 30 days of the date this order is entered on the docket. He must include the temporary docket number assigned to this case, No. 3:13-mc-0068, on his filing. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/13/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
