Martin v. Colvin
| Susan G. Martin |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 3:2014cv00209 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Wilson |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER: The R & R 40 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 24 is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/23/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 24 Motion to Dismiss. The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 24) be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 11/4/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 32 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/16/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 6/17/2014 (dt).
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: The Plaintiff shall have until June 2, 2014, to respond to the motion to dismiss. The Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely file a response may result in a Recommendation to the District Judge that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/22/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: If the plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint, she must file a clearly styled amended complaint within the required time period or file a motion to file an amended complaint. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff by regular, first class mail (only). Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/4/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 8 Motion to Restrain Defendant. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/19/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan G. Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
