Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Crabtree

Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank
Defendant: William Harrison Crabtree, Jr.
Counter_plaintiff: William Harrison Crabtree, Jr.
Counter_defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank
Case Number: 3:2014cv00370
Filed: February 5, 2014
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Office: Nashville Office
County: Williamson
Referring Judge: E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 12:1819
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 23, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that the instant Motion to Strike and Dismiss (Docket No. 9) be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/23/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
February 4, 2015 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 21 ) regarding Plaintiff FDIC's Motion to Strike and Dismiss Certain Purported Counterclaims and Defenses o f the Defendant (Docket No. 8 ). Defendant Crabtree has filed Objections (Docket No. 24) and Plaintiff FDIC has filed a Response (Docket No. 25). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Cou rt has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, Objections, and Response and the file. The Objections of Defendant Crabtree are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/4/2015. (eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Crabtree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank
Represented By: Craig R. Allen
Represented By: John M. Hull
Represented By: Richard C. Mangelsdorf, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Harrison Crabtree, Jr.
Represented By: Adrian H. Altshuler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_plaintiff: William Harrison Crabtree, Jr.
Represented By: Adrian H. Altshuler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank
Represented By: Craig R. Allen
Represented By: John M. Hull
Represented By: Richard C. Mangelsdorf, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.