Mannie v. Whitefield et al

Mannie v. Whitefield et al

Plaintiff:	Hakeem Hasan Mannie
Defendant:	f/n/u Whitefield and f/n/u Cripps
Case Number:	3:2014cv00541
Filed:	February 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Wilson
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2014	Filing 30 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by thedefendants 22 is GRANTED , and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this cause. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/18/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
August 21, 2014	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 22 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 22) be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/21/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2014

Filing 30 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by thedefendants 22 is GRANTED , and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this cause. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/18/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

August 21, 2014

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 22 MOTION to Dismiss. The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 22) be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/21/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mannie v. Whitefield et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: f/n/u Whitefield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: f/n/u Cripps
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hakeem Hasan Mannie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?