Harding v. State of Tennessee

Harding v. State of Tennessee

Petitioner:	Anthony Harding
Respondent:	State of Tennessee
Case Number:	3:2014cv00607
Filed:	March 5, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2014	Filing 18 ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds merit in the respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 13). Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Docket Entry No. 1) is DENIED and thi s action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules -- § 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely notice of appeal from this order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unable to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Entry of this order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/1/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2014

Filing 18 ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds merit in the respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 13). Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Docket Entry No. 1) is DENIED and thi s action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules -- § 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely notice of appeal from this order, such notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unable to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Entry of this order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/1/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harding v. State of Tennessee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Represented By:	Nicholas White Spangler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Harding
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?