Telos Holdings, Inc. v. S.A.A.R. SrL et al
Plaintiff: Telos Holdings, Inc.
Defendant: S.A.A.R. SrL and Believe Digital
Case Number: 3:2014cv00957
Filed: April 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, the defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court's February 7, 2017 Order (Docket No. 115) is hereby AMENDED to add the following language: T he Default Judgment (Docket No. 76) and related Entry of Judgment (Docket No. 77) are void and should not be subject to execution in this or any other jurisdiction. The plaintiff is ORDERED to return to the defendants within ten (10) days any funds previously collected through enforcement of the Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/7/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Motion to Grant Relief from Default Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(4) and Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(2) is hereby GRANTED. The court's prior Order of Default Judgment against the Hadaway Def endants (Docket No. 76) is hereby VACATED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entry of this Order shall constitute judgment in the case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/7/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
January 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket No. 106) is hereby DENIED. In keeping with the court's October 19, 2016 Order, the parties shall file supplemental briefing on personal jurisdi ction by January 30, 2017 so that the court may resolve the defendants' pending Motion to Grant Relief From Default Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(4) and Dismiss Under rule 12(b)(2) (Docket No. 89). Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/11/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
June 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM and ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the parties may engage in discovery relevant to specific personal jurisdiction only for ninety (90) days from the entry of this Order concluding on September 28, 2016. On October 28, 2016 the par ties may file supplemental briefs with regard to the jurisdictional question, at which time the court will decide the pending motion. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/28/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
August 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT: Motions filed by Believe and SAAR will be granted, claims against Believe and SAAR will be dismissed, and the court will order further proceedings relative to the Hadaway Defendants. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/7/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the stay of discovery is LIFTED so that the parties may engage in discovery relevant to specific personal jurisdiction only for ninety (90) days from the entry of this Order. Within twenty (20) days) following the period of discovery, the parties may file supplemental briefs with regard to the pending jurisdictional motions. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/23/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 1/23/2015 (hb).
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Motion to Amend the Complaint 11 is Granted without opposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 7/30/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Telos Holdings, Inc. v. S.A.A.R. SrL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telos Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer S. Ghanem
Represented By: Jason L. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.A.A.R. SrL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Believe Digital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?