Geohegan v. Secretary of the Army

Geohegan v. Secretary of the Army

Plaintiff:	Paul E. Geohegan
Defendant:	Secretary of the Army
Case Number:	3:2014cv00966
Filed:	April 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 4208
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2015	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court rules as follows: (1) The R&R (Docket No. 13) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, Alternatively, for Failure to State a Claim is hereby GRANTED; (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/13/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
December 9, 2014	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Secretary of the Army. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/09/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2015

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court rules as follows: (1) The R&R (Docket No. 13) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, Alternatively, for Failure to State a Claim is hereby GRANTED; (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/13/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

December 9, 2014

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Secretary of the Army. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 12/09/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geohegan v. Secretary of the Army
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul E. Geohegan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary of the Army
Represented By:	Mark H. Wildasin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?