Hunt v. Wilson Co Jail Admin et al
| Mitchell Hunt |
| Robert Bryant and Wilson Co Jail Admin |
| 3:2014cv01044 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Wilson |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Before the court is the plaintiff's objection (ECF No. 47 ) to the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by Magistrate Judge Juliet Griffin (ECF No. 44 ), recommending that the motion fo r partial summary judgment (ECF No. 35 ) filed by defendants Sheriff Robert Bryan and Lieutenant Doug Whitefield be granted and that this action be dismissed. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the court hereby OVE RRULES the plaintiff's objection, ACCEPTS the R&R, and GRANTS the defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. In addition, the plaintiff's retaliation claim is DISMISSED under the authority of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is so ORDERED. This is the final judgment in this action for purposes of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/23/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
