Kopecky v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
| Frances B. Kopecky |
| Group Long-Term Disability Plan for Employees of Vanderbilt University and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 3:2014cv01200 |
| May 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Williamson |
| Joe Brown |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 24), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. T he Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count II (Docket No. 13 ) is DENIED without prejudice to being re-filed at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/4/2014. (eh)
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim to relief (Docket Entry 13) be DENIED without prejudice to refile at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/15/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
