Boggs v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
| Bonnie Boggs |
| Robert Arnold and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center |
| 3:2014cv01205 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER Assessing Filing Fee ($350) for Bonnie Boggs per granting of 2 plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff here does not allege that her injury resulted from the implementation of any policy or custom of the municipality, much less an unconstitutional one, or that Sheriff Robert Arnold was personally involved in the incident. The Court therefore finds, for purposes of the initial review required by the PLRA, that the plaintiff's complaint fai ls to state a claim for which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. An appeal of this order would not be in good faith. It is so ORDERED. This is the final order in this action for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/27/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail & Warden of the Tennessee Prison for Women by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
