Newby v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
| Bert Newby and Montez Adams |
| Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield and Tony C. Parker |
| 3:2014cv01750 |
| August 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Have considered the record de novo in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants Motion to Dis miss is GRANTED; (3) All remaining Motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and (4) This case is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Order. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/22/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) Modified on 3/23/2017 (eh).
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: In light of the foregoing, the Court rules as follows: (1) With respect to the Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of the State Defendant (Docket No. 111) the R & R (Docket No. 119) is ACCEPTED insofar as it recommends dismissal of the claims against TDOC and the claims for money damages against Defendants Schofield and Parker in their official capacity. Those claims are hereby DISMISSED. (2) With respect to the Partial Motion to Dismiss filed on be half of the CCA Defendants (Docket No. 83), the R & R (Docket No. 119) is ACCEPTED insofar as it recommends dismissal of the claims against Defendants Chapman, Spears, and Hininger, and those claims are hereby DISMISSED; (3) The claims against Def endant Clinical Services (which was sued as Centurion Medical Services) are hereby DISMISSED; and (4) The Clerk shall term the following as pending; (a) the R & R (Docket No. 119); (b) the Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 83 and 111 ); and (c) Pl aintiff's Objections (Docket No.125). This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial case management and a Report and Recommendation on any further dispositive motions. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/12/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
