Fisher v. United States Marshal Service et al
John Fisher, Jr. |
Southern Health Partners and (f/n/u) Matthews |
3:2014cv01795 |
September 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Robertson |
Juliet E. Griffin |
Kevin H. Sharp |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 54 ) is hereb y ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/1/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/6/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 40 ORDER: Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and the applicable law, the Court hereby overrules Plaintiff's objection and accepts and approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation for the reasons set forth therein a nd above. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motions for temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Docket Entry Nos. 5, 8, 14) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/11/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Presently pending before the Court are the plaintiff's motion to transfer (Docket Entry No. 5 ), motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 8 ), and motion for a "pr eliminary injunction transfer to Grayson, Ky." (Docket Entry No. 14 ). In these motions, the plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to: 1) order his transfer from the RCDC to the facility in Grayson, Kentucky; and 2) order the Defendants to provi de him with medical care and access to legal materials at the RCDC. The Government stated that the plaintiff was transferred from the RCDC to the Criminal Justice Center in Davidson County, Tennessee, on September 30, 2014, see Docket Entry No. 93 , and the Court denied the plaintiff's motion as moot. Accordingly, the plaintiff's several motions for preliminary injunctive relief should be DENIED. The plaintiff's recent transfer from the RCDC moots both his request for a trans fer and his request for an order that he be provided with health care and access to legal materials at the RCDC. Further, this Court, in the context of a civil lawsuit, has no authority to mandate the location of the plaintiff's pre-trial de tention in the criminal proceedings brought against him. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 10/9/2014. (xc:Pro se party at both RCDC and CJC by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 10/9/2014 (hb). |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/30/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.