Wildasin v. Mathes et al
Plaintiff: Joan Ross Wildasin
Defendant: Peggy D. Mathes and Hiland, Mathes & Urquhart
Case Number: 3:2014cv02036
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 268 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion 267 , the Report and Recommendation is REJECTED in part and ADOPTED AND APPROVED in part. Defendant's Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. [ 228]) and Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, Alternatively, for a New Trial (Doc. No. 238 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees, Expenses, and Prejudgment Interest (Doc. No. 230 ) is GRAN TED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff will be awarded prejudgment interest in the amount of $32,873.78, as requested. Doc. No. 262 at 15. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/28/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 219 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 196 Motion in Limine; denying 197 Motion in Limine; denying 198 Motion in Limine; denying 199 Motion in Limine; denying 200 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 208 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Curtis Collier on 8/14/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
August 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 194 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Judge Curtis Collier on 8/1/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
April 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 109 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/12/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/31/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
March 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/11/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wildasin v. Mathes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Ross Wildasin
Represented By: Eugene N. Bulso, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peggy D. Mathes
Represented By: John D. Kitch
Represented By: Peter C. Robison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hiland, Mathes & Urquhart
Represented By: Thomas Clifford Corts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?