Heithcock v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al
| Samara Heithcock |
| Tennessee Department of Children's Services, James M. Henry, Sharonika Nelson Jones, Jamila Sugri and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2014cv02377 |
| December 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/20/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT: The plaintiff's Motion to Alter, Amend or Set Aside Order of Dismissal (Docket No. 36)is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/14/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Department of Children's Services, James M. Henry, Sharonika Nelson Jones, and Jamila Sugri 11 is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Henry, Jones, and Sugri 23 is GRANTED. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and they are dismissed without prejudice. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/14/15. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
