Bennett v. Highland Graphics, Inc. et al
Chris Bennett |
Highland Graphics, Inc. and Ron Wall |
3:2014cv02408 |
December 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Robertson |
John S. Bryant |
William J. Haynes |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 298 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Both parties' motions to file reply briefs (Doc. Nos. 281 , 287 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial on Back Pay Damages (Doc. No. 267 ) are DE NIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Liquidated Damages and Pre-judgment Interest (Doc. No. 269) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks liquidated damages and GRANTED IN PART with respect to the request for prej udgment interest. Defendants' Motion for Renewed Judgment as a Matter of Law [sic] (Doc. No. 275 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/10/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 150 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/17/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr. on 5/18/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.