Harris v. Davidson County Sheriff et al
Plaintiff: Vaughn Harris
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions
Case Number: 3:2015cv00356
Filed: April 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 360 ORDER finding as moot 356 Motion attempt to file writ of certiorari. Plaintiff given instruction on proper way to file petition with the U. S. Supreme Court. (JBB)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 336 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in this Opinion and Order, IT IS ORDERED that defendant Aluoch's motion for summary judgme nt (docket entry 319 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendants Dr. Lewis, Correct Care Solutions, and the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County for summary judgment (docket entry 316 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendants Dr. Lewis, Correct Care Solutions, and the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County for leave to file a corrected affidavit (docket entry 331 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket entry 318 , PageID 3714-37) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 12/10/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 230 OPINION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS ORDERED that the complaint in this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Bernard A. Friedman on 4/5/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
February 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 35 Report and Recommendation. Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept thedisposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R, (Docket No. 35), is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; and (2) Petitioner's claims against Davidson County Sheriff's Department, Granvisse Earl, D. Weikal, B. Bourne, K. Rogers, Sgt. L. Farley, B. Jepson, Sgt. Wright, M. Stephens, f/n/u Young, and John/Jane Doe (dental assistant) are DISMISSED. (3) Petitioner shall have 21 days from the entry of this order to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/3/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
August 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 135 Report and Recommendation.Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 135) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; and (2) Harris's claims against A. Hayes are DISMISSED WITHOU T PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/3/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) Modified Text on 8/4/2016 (am).
June 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 135 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/17/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
June 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 135 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : The Magistrate Judge recommends that the case against this Defendant be dismissed without prejudice and that any appeal from such a decision not be certified as taken in good faith. Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has 14 days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have 14 days from receipt of any o bjections filed in this Report in which to file any responses to said objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/15/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Davidson County Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vaughn Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?