Breeden v. Fuson
| Nathan Breeden |
| John Fuson and Montgomery County Jail |
| 3:2015cv00479 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Montgomery |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 16 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in accordance w ith Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/28/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint. As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Courts previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 10/5/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/19/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (ds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
