Harber v. State of Tennessee et al
| Matthew Lee Harber |
| Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Darrin Hall and Davidson County |
| 3:2015cv00528 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: On July 6, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 32), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of l aw of this court. For the reasons expressed therein it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/5/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail) (ds)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that to the extent this is a petition for habeas corpus, it be denied without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/6/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (ds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
