Greer v. Day

Greer v. Day

Plaintiff:	Johnny Jerome Greer
Defendant:	Reggina Day
Case Number:	3:2015cv00545
Filed:	May 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 23, 2016	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On February 23, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Docket No. 15 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/23/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
February 3, 2016	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. In view of the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/3/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 23, 2016

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On February 23, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Docket No. 15 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/23/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

February 3, 2016

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. In view of the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/3/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greer v. Day
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny Jerome Greer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reggina Day
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?