Nelson v. Zook et al
| Charles D. Nelson |
| f/n/u Zook, f/n/u Arregtion, f/n/u Little, f/n/u Nickademuss and f/n/u Royal |
| 3:2015cv00573 |
| May 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER: After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 45 ) is GRANTED and Defendants' motion to ascertain status of case (Docket Entry No. 56 ) is DE NIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal of this Order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/14/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
57
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the pending motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 45 ) be granted and the motion to ascertain the status of the motion (Docket Entry 56 ) be termed as moot Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 12/18/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
