Ford v. Lemelle et al
Elizebeth Ford |
Roy Lemelle and Blake Roosevelt |
3:2015cv00930 |
August 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
John S. Bryant |
John T. Nixon |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10 ) is GRANTED. All claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from th is Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/30/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 10/17/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.