Hatch v. CEVA Logistics et al
| Carlos F. Hatch |
| CEVA Logistics and Elwood Staffing |
| 3:2015cv01479 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER: Therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint in this action was filed too late, and the Court must dismiss it. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 26) is over-ruled, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/16/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15 ) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/18/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
