Del Mazo v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
Luis A. Del Mazo, Jr. |
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of New York Mellon, The |
3:2016cv00032 |
January 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
Kevin H. Sharp |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court agrees with the analysis conducted by the magistrate judge, and therefore accepts his recommendation that plaintiff lacks standing and the court therefore lacks subject mat ter jurisdiction over the case. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Senior Judge George Caram Steeh, III on 7/19/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab) |
Filing 23 ORDER: The R & R 10 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and "Plaintiff'sEmergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Application for Temporary Injunction" 9 is hereby DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/29/16. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the instant Motion (Docket No. 9 ) should be DENIED Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/25/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (afs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.