McNeal et al v. Smith & Wesson Corporation et al
| Randy McNeal and Vicki McNeal |
| Smith & Wesson Corporation and Unidentified John Doe Employees |
| 3:2016cv00067 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Objections are over-ruled, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is affirmed, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to cl ose the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/16/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) be GRANTED, and that this action be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/18/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
